People have asked me about my views on World War II, and certain specific and controversial topics like the H word or nukes, and I’ve discussed them in videos like VDS #10 (Everything’s Fine) and VDS #18 (Wars & Rumors). However recently I was motivated to put all of these things in writing so that you have a comprehensive written resource, and also because the material in this resource is not something I can or will make a video on (due to censorship). I will also discuss things here that I have not discussed in detail in the above referenced videos and give these topics a full treatment because even FENNEC may sometimes stumble on some of them due to the nature of narrative control. As a result of this work FENNEC has also been updated and tweaked to be (hopefully) able to give you these facts and figures in as much of a non-biased way as possible.
A first important caveat is that I am not a white nationalist, Nazi supporter or fascist. I do not hate Jews or believe all Jews are evil or that Jews rule the world. I also don’t give Zionism or Talmudic Judaism or occult/elite Jewry a free pass in history because of “antisemitism.” I believe the Nazis were deceived and idolatrous just like any evil empire in history, and they were raised up in judgment by God just like He raised up every other power. Hitler was very disturbed, and was also a puppet of the Vatican. The Nazis were also obsessed with the occult, and many modern revisionist documentaries (like Europa, the Last Battle) though full of useful facts, are nevertheless laced with white nationalist propaganda, white Israelite theories, favorable views toward Catholicism and other incorrect beliefs. And just because I may cite a historian or source does not mean I fully endorse or agree with everything they believe.
So for me it is always about walking a narrow, nuanced road on any topic. I do not identify as a historical revisionist or even as a Holocaust denier, in the sense that I believe lots of Jews (and other people) died in concentration camps, as well as there being many abuses and killings — because all wars have these things. However I have learned too much history in my life to blindly accept the narrative given by governments on any issue, let alone those who stand to gain billions of dollars or massive control from such narratives. That is why my position is about healthy skepticism without drifting into other errors.
The next important caveat to all of this is that Zionism and the paradigm after WWII is now collapsing, and will soon give way to the final trick which will be the image of the Beast governmental system that will enforce Satan’s common good morality on the world. Authors William Strauss and Neil Howe (authors of The Fourth Turning) postulated that major historical cycles happen about every 80 years, and indeed today we are just over 80 years since the end of WWII, with many significant financial, geopolitical and spiritual developments happening that validate this observation.
So my point with this caveat is that, while this information is useful, it matters more to understand the ultimate purpose of Zionism, who was using it and for what purpose, and the final destination of history. Zionism was never about taking over the world and enforcing Noahide laws or Talmudic Judaism or the Kabbalah. Zionism was a papal crusade disguised as Jewish imperialism and architected by Jesuits and Freemasons to destroy Protestantism and submit the world to a singular moral authority, the Pope — just as the Bible predicted thousands of years ago. That is what matters when you study these topics, otherwise it is easy to drift into conspiratorial thinking and hyper-fixation on Jewish involvement in world affairs, as so many unfortunately are being baited into right now. With that in mind, a third important caveat follows.
EVERYTHING’S A LIE & HISTORY IS WRITTEN BY THE WINNERS
In the 20th century alone, we can survey the top crises and see how each is not what it seems. The Federal Reserve act and the confiscation of Americans’ gold, the sinking of the Titanic, the CIA and its weaponization of LSD to create the hippie movement, the assassination of JFK, the moon landing hoax, removing the gold standard, the various orchestrated financial collapses, the countless revolutions the military industrial complex facilitated throughout the world, the Oklahoma City bombing and 9/11.
Besides these are many others, and the point is that history is not what we are told it is. This is for many simple reasons. Satan is the god of this world (2 Corinthians 4:4) and has authority over the institutions, which means he controls the narrative. Of course God has ultimate authority, and gives awareness to His sheep by breaking them free from Satan’s lies, but the majority of the world is deceived one way or another. And because Satan controls empires and institutions, it is also the case that history is written by the winners. If the winner is the father of lies, then history will inevitably be filled with lies and half-truths. That doesn’t mean all history is a lie, but it does mean we have to be discerning with certain subjects.
These basic principles do not require you to be a “conspiracy theorist” or “truther” — they require you to be honest with what the Bible says about the devil and honest with the arc of history. God has cursed the world to get worse and worse over time, and also authorized Satan to deceive the nations into worshiping him as God at the end of time. These two realities mean that, as we near the end of history, we should expect maximum delusion and maximum evil. In the last century alone, more people have been destroyed in various ways than in all the years beforehand. Deception has reached a maximum, and so has human greed. I have stated that I do not see the world going past the mid 2030’s at this rate. Time will tell, but even on a cursory level, you can clearly discern that things are not right.
And if all of this is true, then the million dollar question arises: have we been told the truth about World War II? Or is it possible that, like practically everything else, there is an element of deception? Many layers of deception, in fact? Is it possible that there was an agenda behind this incredible conflict, and that it was orchestrated for a purpose? Is it possible that what we’ve been told about things like Anne Frank, nukes, the Holocaust or Zionism are intentionally misrepresented and misleading?
Given the simple facts I just presented to you, the honest student of history will say that yes, it is possible. To say otherwise is to be blind to reality and to the power of Satan, as well as the warnings of scripture. So then if this is possible, what actually happened and what didn’t?
THE ORIGINS & DESTINATION OF ZIONISM
I have spoken at great length about Zionism in many places, so I will not repeat everything discussed here. However a cursory review of important facts is in order, so as to properly set the context for everything else.
Most people believe Zionism began with Theodor Herzl in the late 1800’s, but this is false. Zionism began with the Jesuits in the 1500’s, when they reinterpreted the prophecies of the Bible with ideas like a rebuilt Jewish temple (and therefore the need for a Jewish state) and a personal antichrist walking into that temple. These ideas were propagated by Jesuits Ribera, Bellarmine and Lacunza. Lacunza wrote his treatise and commentary under a Jewish pseudonym as a disguise, and his writings influenced the rise of dispensationalism in America through Irving and Darby. Meanwhile, Scofield was being propped up to promote the same ideas throughout America by people with nefarious motives, such as the Freemasons and Rothschilds. It is possible Scofield himself was a Freemason but that is besides the point.
Yet another important development in the narrative of Zionism was Napoleon, who was a Jesuit pawn in reshaping Europe after the French Revolution. Napoleon, at the turn of the century around 1800, famously declared that if he conquered Palestine he would rebuild the Jewish temple, and he propagated many radical pro-Jewish reforms in his areas of influence. Thus Napoleon was marketed by the Jesuits as a Jewish messiah, someone that would usher in the political victory and worldly salvation that the Jews had lusted after for centuries. Napoleon failed, and as a result and in his wake there began a dialectic in Europe between countries that were pro-Jewish (Napoleonic reforms) or still very anti-Jewish (traditionalists). In this political climate you saw the rise of thinkers like Moses Hess and, eventually, Theodor Herzl.
While it is true that the Jews had various revolutionary and messianic aspirations throughout history, like with Sabbatai Zevi (and later Jacob Frank), the reality is that these movements fizzled quickly and never had any chance in Christendom. It was not until the Reformation created the need for a Counter-Reformation, and the Jesuits developed their eschatological framework to hide the Beast and elevate the Jews in Bible prophecy as they did. Granted, that the Sabbatai Zevi movements were in the 1600s (and following), but even prior to these events the Jews had many messiah claimants and many revolutions, from the early days following the 70 AD judgment (like the Bar Kokhba revolt with its false messiah) and throughout time. So the Jesuits were very well aware of the burning Jewish desire for a return to political significance, and what the Jewish mind wanted — and when the Reformation forced a re-framing of these prophecies, the union between Rome and Judea became clear. Within 150 years after Napoleon’s failure, England had been taken over by the Rothschild central banking scheme, and the Balfour Agreement was created to establish the State of Israel.
Hitler was integral to the creation of the State of Israel through his Haavara Agreement, a plan to move tens of thousands of Jews to Palestine and facilitate the establishment of this new regime. In fact there are coins minted from that era with a Star of David on one side and a Nazi Swastika on the other, commemorating the collaboration of the Zionists and Nazis toward this end, particularly between 1933-1939. That’s because contrary to popular understanding, Hitler and the Germans wanted to offer the Jews a chance to leave Germany on peaceable terms. Hitler’s reforms primarily targeted the debauchery being promoted by Jewish owned media of the time, as well as the predatory usury that was happening. Jews represented about 1-2% of the German population, yet they controlled a significant amount of the institutions. However the original intent was to move the Jewish people out and to their own location in Palestine, not systematically round them up to waste resources on killing them. It’s also true that most Jews in Europe were concentrated in Poland and Ukraine, with relatively small pockets everywhere else.
Notably Hitler was part Rothschild (bankers of the Vatican) and was also surrounded by Catholic interests. Franz Von Pappen, a wealthy aristocrat and Knight of Malta, helped raise Hitler to power. The SS was modeled supposedly after the Jesuits. A Jesuit priest, or former Jesuit, Bernhard Staempfle, wrote Hitler’s Mein Kempf. Many of the Nazi officials were Knights of Malta members, and in fact some of them were even recruited after the war to further the Military Industrial Complex through various operations, like Operation Paperclip. Some examples also include Reinhard Gehlen (Hitler's chief military intelligence officer on the Eastern Front and later the first head of West Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service or BND) who worked side by side with US and Mossad intelligence against the Soviets post-war, or Otto Skorzeny (a highly decorated Waffen-SS Lieutenant Colonel and Hitler’s favorite commando leader) who in the early 1960s, when Egypt was developing a military rocket program aimed at Israel with the help of former Nazi scientists, was recruited by Mossad as an insider to do intelligence work. In exchange for being removed from Israel’s assassination target list, Skorzeny provided Mossad with the names and addresses of the German scientists in Egypt. He even traveled to Egypt, where he personally mailed exploding package bombs to military factories on behalf of Israel. People have also documented the Vatican ratlines — secret escape routes the Nazi’s used to get away, aided by Rome and the Vatican (and likely the Jesuits). Catholic apologists will point to the initial conflict between the Nazis and the Catholic Church, but this was solved in 1933 in the Reichskonkordat; a treaty signed on July 20, 1933, between Nazi Germany and the Vatican that regulated and secured the rights of the Catholic Church in Germany. Documents have also been discovered pointing to a secret backchannel between Pius XII and Hitler, with these things being documented in books like Hitler’s Pope by John Cornwell.
Francis Cardinal Spellman, the Archbishop of New York, actively solicited votes in the United Nations to secure Israel’s admission as a member state in 1949. The final vote came in 13 no to 33 yes — exactly the two sides of Freemasonry, the Jewish side (33 Scottish rite) and the Catholic/Templar side (13 York Rite). Spellman is also the same one that was heavily involved in the Vietnam war (hence why it was called “Spellman’s War”). As early as 1954, Spellman strongly urged the U.S. government to intervene in French Indochina to stop the spread of communism. He played a significant role in promoting Ngô Đình Diệm, a devout Catholic an anti-communist, helping arrange the political and public relations backing that led to Diệm becoming the president of South Vietnam. Because Spellman was so instrumental in establishing this early American-backed Catholic leadership in Saigon, many have argued this was part of Rome’s political tentacles going out in the world to use America as the sword to do her bidding. Spellman also re-framed the war into a “war for civilization” and “Christ’s war against the Vietcong and the people of North Vietnam”. He even personally visited troops in South Vietnam during Christmas, dressed in military regalia, and blessed weapons like B-52 bombers, declaring that American troops were fighting as “soldiers of Christ.” This is why I have said that cardinals and archbishops are not spiritual offices but political ones, because they operate in the world to move along various agendas.
So these are just a few simple facts from history, and they point to a much more convoluted picture than what we are told of the German people just going rogue and wanting to kill everyone. Knowing that the Jesuits have been involved in practically every major revolution of the last 500 years they’ve been around, as well as elite operations and regicide (assassinations of rulers), as well as the Jesuit agenda to reshape Protestant eschatological thought — the motive to control world affairs and bring about (what seems to be) a fulfillment of Bible prophecy through the State of Israel is certainly there. While all of this was happening, dispensationalism was sweeping the US and destroying minds, and Freemasonic institutions like the Dallas Theological Seminary were hard at work programming the next generation of pastors and theologians with Jesuit eschatology.
But why? The answer is for multiple reasons. Consider the following and how they benefit Rome’s ultimate end:
Poison the mind of Protestants by validating their false eschatology, eventually building a fanatical base of Christian Zionists that would be completely discredited when the ugly truth of what they supported would come out (i.e. now), and until that day suck them dry of money to fund endless wars and destabilizations in the world
As result of the previous, create a massive influx of conversions into Catholicism when dispensationalism is exposed (i.e. now)
Destabilize the Muslim world by placing a hostile, imperialist regime right in the middle of their territory, which would create endless wars and therefore economic and social instability that demands a peaceful solution (only brokered by the papacy and its agents)
As a result of the previous, involve America in the Middle East to prop up a Petro-Dollar fiat system that could be used to borrow endlessly for constant military and psychological campaigns against the enemies of Rome and central banking, destabilizing governments and installing loyal puppets for the final NWO system (today this is practically achieved)
Give the Jews a taste of the salvation they want, only to collapse it in the end and destroy the Jewish identity so that it can reborn in the Catholic image (if this sounds crazy, read Theodor Herzl’s diary and his desire to convert his people to Catholicism for the sake of peace)
Hide the real atrocities committed by the Allies during WW2 behind a scapegoat narrative, legalizing persecution for anyone who dared question history
So are these things enough of a motive to twist or hide some facts of history? I would think so. However don’t forget that this narrative was designed to ultimately collapse one day, and that day is fast approaching. Ever since the events in Israel in 2023, the world has increasingly taken notice of the Zionist agenda. People have become “Jew-pilled” and Israel’s popularity has plummeted. Dispensationalism is collapsing, and many as a result are converting to Catholicism and Orthodoxy, because these traditional religions do not have Judaizing obsessions like modern evangelicals do. Even Israel itself is torn in two, as many Jews do not agree with the Zionist agenda and certainly Orthodox Jews are completely against it. As of this year (2026), the war in Iran has ravaged the Middle East and both Israel and Muslim states have suffered greatly and will continue to suffer.
So then we must ask, as usual, cui bono? Who benefits? Is it the Jews that benefit from the world hating Israel? Is it the Muslims the benefit from more war and bloodshed and lost money? Is it dispensational Protestants that benefit from Israel and Zionism being exposed as a corrupt and sinful enterprise that they threw their hard-earned money at for generations? Or is it someone else?
The answer is that Rome benefits, because Israel as a project — despite outward appearances — was a papal crusade designed to self-destruct and, in the process, destroy Protestantism, Islam and the Jewish identity all in one go. Radical Islam will get annihilated, and Zionism has burned itself out. In the next year or two I fully expect this narrative to collapse and all support for Israel to evaporate, as well as political collapse in the state itself. The extremists are being weeded out, and in the process Protestantism has been exposed as foolish for supporting such falsehood.
All 3 enemies of Rome gone in one fell swoop, which is why Zionism’s ultimate end is not to take over the world but to serve Rome’s purposes in doing so. Zionism is obviously evil, and nobody marvels or willingly submits to obvious and oppressive evil. So Zionism will collapse, and in the wake of this coming collapse the Jewish identity will need to be reinvented. Enter the common good social salvation of the papacy, which will bring peace to the Middle East and resolve all of the problems. With the extremists gone, those who will sacrifice truth for comfort are the only ones left — and they will easily compromise to the new thing. Add a few signs and wonders, maybe an apparition from Mary or even Jesus, and it won’t be hard at all.
Whether they end up building the third temple again or not is irrelevant, because that eschatology is wrong. Therefore whatever happens is a deception. The question is, how far are they planning to go? That remains to be seen, but Zionism is not what you’ve been told. The Bible informs us that Satan gave his throne and power to the Beast, and the Beast comes out of the 4th empire, which is Rome. Judea is not factored into the equation, and before anyone points to Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 (the Synagogue of Satan), take note that the word there is the word for “assembly” — a word that is also used of the Church (James 2:2). And considering that Paul calls true worshipers of Christ as Jews (Romans 2:29), then it stands to reason that these verses in Revelation have a greater meaning when applied to the breadth of the entire Church Age; that is, they describe duplicitous people that claim to be worshipers of God yet secretly worship the devil. If that’s true, then “The Society of Jesus” or Freemasons easily qualify, alongside Jewish and Muslim occult and secret societies and others, like the Rosicrucians and many similar examples. All of these are people who claim to be worshipers of God yet do the opposite, and this is what the Bible warns of consistently throughout the New Testament — false worship, false converts, false faith and spiritual delusion, as well as those who would use spiritual hierarchy to oppress God’s people (like Diotrephes or the Nicolaitans).
So in summation, Zionism is coming to an end. It is not the “final boss” of the story, it is the scapegoat that the final boss (the papacy) is dangling in front of people’s eyes to enrage and bait them into a particular way of thinking. In order for the papacy to enforce its morality of Sunday sacredness upon the world, it must justify hating those who would object to it and obey God instead. Therefore Zionism has a final purpose in demonizing those who would keep the Sabbath, by associating the Sabbath to all the evils of Zionist imperialism and Talmudic Judaism, which of course there is no association. But the Catholic teaching has always been that the Sabbath is a “Jewish thing” and therefore anyone who associates themselves with God’s moral precept is undesirable socially.
If all of this sounds crazy, one only needs look to history to see plenty of examples, such as the Council of Laodicea in the 4th century, which warned Christians not to “Judaize” by keeping the Sabbath or they would be shut out from Christ, or the various popes in history like Gregory or Eugene IV, who called Sabbath keepers antichrists and excommunicated from the Church (and therefore heretics worthy of death). So once again we see the rise of Jew-hating in culture, and that should be a sign that the final trick is on the horizon, because as long as Judaism exists — it will always act as a shield for those who do not want to submit to the word of the papacy.
Therefore the ecumenical Nostra Aetate message of Vatican II is just a ruse, because the Catholic Church demands submission to the papacy and it has always taught that there is no salvation outside of itself. That is why Zionism has an end, and that end is to serve Rome one last time by creating the final precedent to antagonize and persecute God’s true believers.
Understanding the interweaving of Rome and Judea, and how Zionism only gained life when it served the purposes of Rome, is something that few grasp today because they do not have the Bible as their foundation. But with scripture and history together we can see greater and deeper patterns, the secret workings of Satan in the background, and that is why scripture is so valuable. Therefore do not buy into the narrative that Zionism is the enemy that needs to be destroyed or that Zionists will take over the world and behead you, a Christian, for not bowing down to the Noahide Laws. Do not buy into the narrative that someone will enter a rebuilt Jewish temple and proclaim himself to be God — even if they choreograph such a thing — because it will be used to fool the world into a false eschatology. Time will tell, but until then we know who benefits and that’s what matters.
With all of this out of the way, we now turn our eyes to a few select controversial topics, the first of which is the diary of Anne Frank.
“We may have been fighting the wrong enemy (Germany) all along. But while we’re here (on the Soviet border), we should go after the bastards now, ‘cause we’re gonna have to fight ‘em eventually.”
General George S. Patton
THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK: LEVIN & THE BALLPOINT PEN
Anne Frank was supposedly a teenaged Jewish girl who kept a diary between approximately 1942-1944 while she was in a concentration camp, and eventually died of typhus due to the deteriorating conditions of these places as the war came to an end. Her diary was then adapted into movies and books and all manner of commercialized merchandise, and she has a foundation today which is very prominent and involved in the Holocaust narrative. However many have questioned the validity of this diary for a variety of reasons, and if it is exposed to be a fraud then it casts doubt on the entire mainstream narrative of World War II.
Immediately obvious when investigating this alleged diary is the infamous ballpoint pen controversy and the charge that the true ghostwriter of the diary was Meyer Levin, a Jewish novelist of the time. Regarding the ballpoint pen theory, you will find many revisionist materials claim that forensic analysis determined the writing to be in ballpoint pen, and since ballpoint pens weren’t commercialized until 1951 (several years after Anne Frank lived and certainly someone in a concentration camp at the end of a war wouldn’t have access to such a novelty), then it doesn’t line up with the narrative that she was the author.
Here we see that things get convoluted, because as usual whenever you are dealing with history and interpretations of history, as well as possible nefarious interventions and human error, facts and fiction are quickly blurred. The ballpoint pen issue is the perfect example, because it is something taken out of context and thus not a strong point to build the case on. It is true that the German Federal Criminal Police (Bundeskriminalamt or BKA) forensically examined the original manuscripts in 1980. However, they found that the entire body of the diary was written in fountain pen ink and pencil, which matched materials from the 1940s. The BKA report noted the presence of minor ballpoint ink marks, but explicitly stated they were confined to two loose scraps of paper and page-number notations. These marks were made by a graphologist (handwriting analyst) who examined the papers in 1959, and by Otto Frank when organizing his daughter’s loose pages after the war. No part of Anne’s actual diary entries contains ballpoint pen ink. In 2006 the BKA issued a formal statement to the effect that their study cannot be used to question the authenticity of the diary.
In 1986, the Netherlands Institute for War Documentation conducted a multi-year forensic examination of the diary, comparing the text against other verified letters and postcards Anne wrote before going into hiding. According to this report the handwriting matched, so the ballpoint pen theory is not as solid as some have claimed.
There is also the matter of Meyer Levin, a Jewish novelist around that time, and his $50,000 lawsuit against Otto Frank. This too is not as it seems. The right-leaning Swedish Journal Fria Ord documented this court case in 1959, and an extract from this article appeared in The American Economic Council Letter, dated April 15th, 1959 as follows:
“History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth. And they become more effective than truth. The western world has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl, through the medium of what purports to be her personally written story, Anne Frank’s diary. Any informed literary inspection would have shown it to be impossible as the work of a teenager. A noteworthy decision of the New York State Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer Meyer Levin has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for his work on the diary.”
This seems pretty damning evidence from the time, but unfortunately it’s not so cut and dry. Meyer Levin did not sue Otto Frank because he wrote the diary, rather he sued over the rights to a Broadway play — an adaptation of the book. After the war, Otto gave Meyer permission to draft a theatrical stage adaptation of the diary. Producers ultimately rejected Levin’s script because they found it too somber, opting instead for a script written by Albert and Frances Hackett. Levin sued Otto and the producers for supposedly using parts of his script without credit. In 1958, a jury initially awarded Levin $50,000 for his theatrical ideas, not for writing the actual diary. However, the award was soon voided by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Coleman due to a lack of proof of damages, and the dispute was later settled out of court. But because news articles of the time were reporting Levin’s “work on the diary” — this has caused speculation that Levin was the actual ghostwriter.
So these two things, Levin and the ballpoint pen issue, are to me “the weeds” of this conversation and not the best place to go if one is a skeptic of these events. However there remain several factors that still warrant some skepticism, and they are the extent of Otto Frank’s co-authorship, motive and the content of the diary itself.
THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK: OTTO & THE CONTENT
Regarding the origin of the diary, there are 3 purported versions: A, B and C. Version A is the original diary of unedited entries Anne wrote for herself from June 12, 1942 until August 1, 1944. These were personal and never intended for public consumption. Version B is a revised version, revised supposedly by Anne herself, in response to a radio broadcast from the Dutch government-in-exile asking citizens to preserve diaries and letters to document the war after it ended. Anne then was inspired to put this together into a book and so made various changes (like removing personal entries, adding various other things, changing real names, etc.). She worked on this version until her arrest. Version C, which is the published work, was the version that Otto put together by comparing Versions A and B.
In European copyright law, a copyright expires after 70 years, which for Anne Frank’s diary meant 2015. So in 2015 the Anne Frank Fonds (the Swiss foundation based in Basel) filed for an extension of the copyright to 2050, claiming that her father, Otto Frank, was the co-author of the work. Because Otto died in 1980, this would extend the copyright by several decades. Although others (like the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam) objected to this, claiming she was the sole author, this poses serious credibility issues. Either the Swiss foundation is lying, or the Anne Frank House is lying. Neither situation is favorable, because if the work was co-authored by her father then this presents a motive problem — since he gained fame and money for the commercialization of her story. It also presents the problem that they were in fact dishonest about her authorship all of these decades even though they knew of Otto’s involvement. If he did not co-author the work, then the Swiss foundation is still lying (to gain copyright advantage), and that also presents the question of, what else are they lying about in order to preserve their influence?
Apologists will respond that Otto did not contribute any content but merely organized the work and published it, which is why he is considered to be a co-author. This is where things again get nebulous, and the reader can determine their own level of skepticism. Certainly Otto commercialized his daughter’s work and profited from it greatly, which means there was some motive to present things as appealing as possible. The mainstream narrative requires that we believe Otto was overseeing this process and collating Anne’s materials, yet contributing nothing to the content himself (only removing sensitive pieces), which again I will leave to the reader to decide whether and to what degree they believe this.
But besides these things, for me personally the strangest part of this narrative is the content itself. In the early parts of her diary (entry dated July 9th, 1942, supposedly three days after going into hiding), Anne describes quite specifically the building she was in (Prinsengracht 263). She goes on with great detail about the ground floor and lower levels and their functions, a secret door, the layout of the first floor and various rooms there, and the upper floor and the rooms there as well as their functions. She also describes the top of the structure, where a room leads up further into the attic and loft.
These architectural details are strange observations for a 13 or 14 year old teenage girl. It doesn’t automatically prove anything, but I find it out of place that a girl with imaginary friends and a vivid imagination would spend so much time and detail describing such mundane things, almost as if to ensure that her readers believe the story. Besides this there are also a variety of strange details in the entirety of the diary itself, such as follows:
Mentions of Christmas celebrations, St. Nicholas and Easter celebrations, even Good Friday, Whitsun (7 weeks leading up to Pentecost) or New Year’s — yet zero mention of Passover, Purim, Yom Kippur or Rosh Hashanah (Jewish New Year). Not even the Sabbath is ever mentioned, even though many entries were on Saturdays. This is strange given that these celebrations were central to Jewish life. Hanukkah is mentioned a few times in passing, but that’s about it.
A mention of receiving an extra quarter pound of butter for Christmas (the allotted allowance plus a bonus), yet she lived in Holland and they didn’t use English measuring units.
A mention of preparing and eating sausages (pork), but she was Jewish and Jews don’t eat pork.
In an entry dated July 6th, 1944, she says regarding her friend Peter: “I can't understand people who don't like to work, but that isn't Peter's problem either. He just doesn't have a goal, plus he thinks he's too stupid and inferior to ever achieve anything. Poor boy, he's never known how it feels to make someone else happy, and I'm afraid I can't teach him. He isn't religious, scoffs at Jesus Christ and takes the Lord's name in vain, and though I'm not Orthodox either, it hurts me every time to see him so lonely, so scornful, so wretched.” This again seems very strange to me for a teenage Jewish girl to say. What would such a person care about someone else scoffing at Jesus, or taking the Lord’s name in vain? Was Jesus her Lord? She claims she wasn’t Orthodox either, but does that mean Orthodox Judaism? Or “orthodox” in a general, God-believing sense? And if so how does that make any sense here given this context?
Various pictures of the original show two distinct styles of writing, like the picture below. The mainstream narrative is that the first style (cursive) is when Anne began writing in her red-and-white checkered diary at age 13, she used a standard, slanted, cursive handwriting taught in school. This is the more sweeping script seen on the left-hand page of the open journal. But as she grew older and began editing her diary for future publication (Version B), she allegedly made a conscious decision and completely changed her writing style. She adopted an upright, legible, rounder block-print style to make her work easier to read. This is also strange to me, given that the former writing is decently legible already, much more aesthetic, much easier (cursive writes faster) and that she was a young girl. Why would young girls do such a thing?
All of these things do not automatically prove that this diary was a fraud, but given the original premise of this article (that we are at the end of history, that Satan controls narratives, etc.), along with the evidence presented, I think it warrants at least some skepticism. It is highly strange for a Jewish girl to be mentioning so many Christian themes in her writings, almost as if she is pandering to a Christian (dispensationalist) audience for sympathy, and yet practically none of the Jewish holidays or even the Sabbath. It is also strange that she “forced” herself to have a different style of writing, one that appears quite different than her original style (and less aesthetic for that matter). Some extreme voices in this space have written in-depth books on the topic, like Simon G. Shepherd, author of Anne Frank’s Novel: The Diary is a Fraud, claiming so far that “Anne Frank never kept a diary. What she called her diary was a collection of sketches, fictional stories and fantasy letters to the 8 members of her imaginary club. In 1944 she re-wrote the lot, calling it a novel. But this was translated in the diary to a romance (by accident). Otto Frank lied when he insisted that he intended not to publish it.” Shepherd of course has been attacked for his claims and blacklisted, and there are many others like him. I let the reader decide what they feel about this topic.
Personally I am skeptical, however it is likely that Anne Frank existed and wrote something. The real points of skepticism for me are the involvement of the father and the extent of his contributions as well as the motive, since it was (and continues to be) a highly profitable endeavor that also shapes cultural narratives. Combined with other points in this article that we will cover, I think some skepticism is warranted — but proving anything is harder than it seems and therefore the diary issue is not something of utmost importance, because ultimately whether Anne Frank was or was not entirely genuine has no bearing on Zionism’s purpose and the destination of history, or the truthfulness of what happened at the concentration camps as a whole or whether nukes are actually real. So it is ultimately besides the point.
NUCLEAR WEAPONS: PROBLEM, REACTION, SOLUTION
In 64 AD, Nero, who was one of the most depraved individuals to rule the Roman Empire, started a fire in Rome that would later be called, The Great Fire — so that he could clear land for lavish building projects (sound familiar?). He quickly blamed Christians for starting the fire, ensuing a wave of heavy persecution for the Church at that time. Why this example is important is that it shows you the same pattern throughout history: problem, reaction, solution. Nero hated the Christians and also wanted more land to develop his projects (desired solution), so he engineered a problem that would justify a reaction in the public (outrage at the Christians to destroy them, and deflecting the blame off his own efforts) and arrive at his desired solution.
This dialectical way of manipulation has been part of Satan’s tactics for thousands of years, and if ancient Rome did it then what are we to say in an era of technology, secret societies and massive institutional control over the flow of information? It is no surprise then that looking even at the last century we see these same tactics with all of the invented crises of the modern age:
The financial crisis of 1907 (“The Panic of 1907”) which ultimately justified the creation of the Federal Reserve
The sinking of the Titanic as a way to crush those who opposed the Fed
The foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor and the government’s refusal to act (because it would justify entering the war)
The coinage of the term “conspiracy theorist” by the CIA as a result of their orchestrated assassination of JFK
The overpopulation narrative (Club of Rome Report) in perfect lockstep with the first supposed picture of the Earth from space, leading to the climate change movement
Vaccine companies lobbying for immunity under the threat of a “pandemic” in the 1980’s and securing Congress’ protection, thereby increasing the required vaccinations for children exponentially (and their profits as a result)
The 9/11 disaster as a justification for more endless wars and mass surveillance
COVID as a justification for totalitarian policies and enforcing common good morality
The list goes on and on, and there are countless other shenanigans in between all of these events. The point is that there is always a boogieman, always a crisis designed to move the needle forward. But to where? The answer is a New World Order, the elite’s desire for a one world government under Satan, a counterfeit of the eternal state that Christ will bring upon His return. That is where all things are headed to one way or another, and with every grab for power and centralization of control — they get closer to achieving that desire one crisis at a time. And they will be successful, because God has destined them to be successful, so that He can get glory over this wicked system when He cracks open the sky and puts an end to evil forever.
But until then we are stuck in an upside down world where smoke and mirrors create frightening shadows on the wall, designed to move you into one pen or another. With that in mind, given the preponderance of these schemes throughout history (and especially in the last century), is it that unlikely that the narrative surrounding nuclear weapons might not be what we’ve been told? Is it possible that this, too, is just another boogieman designed to move the world toward the final result?
Certainly there’s a motive, and by now the schemes of Satan should be very obvious. The threat of a cataclysmic nuclear war is visceral and scary, and that’s the point. It’s so extreme that it justifies whatever narrative they want to push as the solution. With the recent situation in Iran, people have been saying that Iran is just “(insert time period) away from a nuclear weapon” for several decades, all as justification for more military involvement in the Middle East. In the Ukraine-Russia war, threats of nuclear attack have prompted words of peace from the papacy and a rush to ensure world peace throughout, so that we don’t annihilate ourselves.
But the Bible does not warn of a nuclear holocaust. It does not say we will annihilate ourselves. It says there will be marveling and false worship, things that happen in a time of prosperity and peace — and then Christ will appear and annihilate the wicked. So the narrative that we will destroy ourselves with nukes is not possible, because God never decreed such a narrative. But most people do not believe the correct soteriology (monergism), and therefore are suckered by every cry of “Oh no! Watch out! XYZ will happen if you don’t do ABC!”
From climate change to overpopulation to nuclear war, all of these threads ultimately lead to the solution of world peace and world government, the two things the Bible actually warns about in Revelation 13 and 17. There will be peace and prosperity, and in that space a world government (the image of the Beast) will enforce a false spiritual reality — the worship of Satan under the disguise of worshiping God. This is what we are warned of, not nuclear destruction.
So if this is the case, then what is the purpose of the nuclear narrative? As usual there are many:
Provide a justification to demonize anyone you want to destabilize and install central banking and puppet rulers (i.e. Iraq, Iran, North Korea, etc.)
Create the fear of total destruction to justify moving toward world governance and submission to a spiritual moral voice of reason (the papacy)
For WWII specifically: deceive the Axis (and the world) as to the actual power of your military so that you secure world supremacy
Again, is there a motive? Absolutely, and given the other plain facts about “nuclear weapons” that anyone can understand, I think it’s obvious this is just another psyop. Chief among these facts is that there is the typical occult signaling and numerology that the secret societies love to employ in their operations.
NUCLEAR WEAPONS: THE HOAX CODE
Numbers like 33 or 13 are littered everywhere in psyops, and looking at some examples with the nuclear narrative will help illustrate just how choreographed these things really are:
A nuclear bomb needs about 33 pounds (or 15 kilograms) of enriched uranium, where the number 15 is also significant because it relates to the square of Saturn (1/15 = .06666…), an occult symbol where all numbers 1-9 align in a square grid to form rows and columns of 15, and drawing a connecting line between the numbers forms a sigil said to represent Saturn (Satan).
Diameter of a B61 nuclear bomb is 13 inches (33cm), conveniently numbers from both sides of Freemasonry.
By late 1945, the Hanford Engineer Works reactors and chemical separation plants supposedly produced about 33 lbs of weapons-grade plutonium monthly
The W33 (also designated the Mark 33, T317, or M422) was an American nuclear artillery shell designed to be fired from 8-inch (203 mm) howitzers, including the M110 and M115.
Fat Man, the nuclear bomb that was supposedly detonated over Nagasaki, had dimensions of 3.3 meters by 1.5 meters, again we see the 33 and the 15
Harry Truman, the one presiding over these affairs, was the 33rd president and also a 33rd degree Freemason.
The Nagasaki Peace Statue, unveiled on April 1, 1955 (April Fool’s) to mark the 10th anniversary of the bombing, is a 10-meter-tall (approximately 33 feet) bronze monument located in Nagasaki Peace Park in Nagasaki, Japan.
Project Rio Blanco was an underground nuclear test that took place on May 17, 1973 in Rio Blanco County, Colorado, and three 33-kiloton nuclear devices were detonated nearly simultaneously in a single emplacement well deep below the Earth.
A Broken Arrow is an official U.S. military term for an unexpected accident involving nuclear weapons, warheads, or components that does not create a risk of nuclear war. The official Pentagon timeline for these events stops after the 32nd incident — the Titan II missile explosion in Damascus, Arkansas on September 19, 1980. Any serious accidents occurring after 1980 remain classified or have not been added to that specific historic catalog. However, while the official total is 32, a few independent databases or educational publications occasionally reference “33” if they count a highly publicized, unclassified non-DoD mishap (such as a Department of Energy transport incident). In either case, 32 is the officially highest rank of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, with the 33rd degree being an honorary or special designation.
The Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean, which entered into effect in April of 1969, contains 33 member states as signatories.
U.S. Air Force Major Rudolf Anderson Jr.’s death on October 27, 1962 — during the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis — was publicized and supposedly “stopped a nuclear crisis”, being the only casualty of the conflict (likely a sacrifice); his plane was labeled “Target 33” by the Soviets and shot down, prompting Kennedy and Khrushchev to deescalate.
Project 596, the People’s Republic of China’s supposed first successful nuclear weapons test, used a 330-foot (33x10) steel tower as their detonation platform. France’s first supposed nuclear test, done on February 13, 1960, (notice the 13) used the same size platform erected in the Sahara Desert near Reggane, Algeria.
These are just a handful of the typical masonic numerology signaling that is littered all over this narrative. Some may look at these and say we are being paranoid and imaginative, but those who follow the movements of these secret societies know that they always mark their operations with numeric signals as a way to reveal the method, mock the ignorant and signal to the initiated that it is an operation. These things alone do not prove that nuclear bombs themselves are fake, but they do establish plausible skepticism of the narrative, because the same deceptive forces are at play as everywhere else.
NUCLEAR WEAPONS: HIROSHIMA & NAGASAKI
Besides motive and occult signaling, the real nail in the coffin for the nuke narrative is the actual evidence from Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These cities were not nuked. They were bombed and destroyed with heavy explosives, but no nuclear weapons were dropped on these places because nuclear weapons (as they are presented) do not exist.
We are told that Little Boy (dropped on Hiroshima) had an explosive yield of approximately 15 kilotons of TNT (15,000 metric tons), and Fat Man (dropped on Nagasaki and more powerful) had an explosive yield of approximately 21 kilotons of TNT (21,000 metric tons). They were dropped at 580 meters (1,900 feet) and 500 meters (1,650 feet) above the ground, respectively, for maximum blast damage. For reference, the destructive power of the GBU-43/B MOAB (Massive Ordnance Air Blast) is only 11 tons of TNT, and it has a blast radius of up to 1 mile, with anyone being within 2500 feet of the detonation point being destroyed by the shockwave.
Keep this part in mind.
Putting this into perspective, a single MOAB is about 30 feet (~9 meters) in length and 40 inches (~1 meter in diameter). It weighs about 22,000 pounds (~9850 kg), of which about 19,000 pounds is explosive content (about ~8500 kg). In order to arrive at the blast power of the Little Boy that was dropped on Hiroshima, you would need 1,363 MOABs, and 1,909 MOABs for Fat Man. Imagine for a moment, given the size of a single MOAB, what it means for 1,300 or almost 2,000 of these things to be dropped on a single area.
But let’s take this further. If we were to package all of these MOABs into a single block, how big would that block have to be? For Little Boy the width of the block of bombs would be about 105 feet (32 meters) by 110 feet (33 meters) by 90 feet (27 meters), with a total volume of over 1 million cubic feet. For Fat Man, it would be 110x110x120 feet, for a total of over almost 1.5 million cubic feet.
This is what is told to you that was dropped on these two cities, which is an unimaginable amount of destruction. There are easily available online videos of various explosive tests on land and sea, using a fraction of this explosive power, and one can clearly see with their own eyes the devastation that happens to ships or buildings or whatever else is anywhere within the blast radius. Multiply this by factors of 10, 100 or more and what do you expect to see?
The answer is that you expect to see nothing, because such a destructive power would leave nothing in its wake. Yet what do we see when we look at pictures of Hiroshima? We see bridges completely intact, concrete buildings, even the famous Atomic Dome (which is now part of the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum) — all of which retain their form outside of some superficial damage. The famous dome itself was at ground zero, only ~500 meters below the detonation point, yet all that is missing are some windows and a little roofing.
This does not make sense whatsoever. You cannot tell me that 1300+ MOABs were dropped on Hiroshima and such structures remained. It is physically impossible. The force of such a blast would absolutely destroy everything within its radius. There is evidence of burning in these photos, but that’s because Japan was firebombed, not nuked. A lot of homes were also made from wood at that time, which is why they were leveled easily. But the concrete buildings (like the dome at ground zero or bridges) remain and that is the easiest tell that what we’ve been told is simply not true.
There is also the matter of radiation, which is supposedly the hallmark of nuclear weapons. We have historical examples in Chernobyl and Fukushima, both of which were incredible disasters and require serious quarantines and safety measures. Yet despite these plain examples, we are to believe that despite the warnings these places would be totally inhabitable for 70 years — they in fact began rebuilding immediately and returned to sprawling metropolitan cities within a decade, with no cancer epidemic or wild mutations in the populace or any such thing. Why, if this was a nuclear incident, was it not consistent with documented, real nuclear incidents?
And what of the propaganda that we see in old video footage? To our modern eyes, which are used to AI and fancy graphics, it’s easy to tell the fakery from 80 years ago. Namely, you see videos of horrendous and terrifying blasts being filmed — yet the camera itself somehow miraculously is unharmed or shaken by the same blast it is supposedly within the radius of. There are also videos of giant explosions in the sea, making their way up into the clouds around the area — yet the clouds themselves don’t move so much as a single inch despite this outward force, suggesting that the footage is actually a composite of (probably) a smaller explosion superimposed over a serene ocean view from high above to make it seem more impressive.
Lastly one cannot forget the influence and track record of the Jesuits, who were expelled from Japan in the 16th and 17th centuries, and also killed by the imperial authority of the time for political subversion. Nagasaki was the home of a famous execution done to several Jesuits, as well as other priest agents (like the Franciscans). It took about two centuries from these events to get revenge, and that is exactly what Nagasaki and Hiroshima were — a way to enact revenge and also subjugate Japanese culture into a commercialized vassal state that would participate in central banking and ultimately be loyal to the papacy.
Today, Princess Nobuko of Mikasa is the first Catholic princess to lead her branch of the Japanese Imperial Family, and Japan itself has been Americanized over the decades ensuing after WWII with commercialization and 24/7 work — putting it in a perfect position to have a spiritual rebirth and enter the common good Sunday sacredness agenda that will be propagated to the world.
Further evidence that this was a psyop are the 8 Jesuits who emerged completely unscathed from their above-ground church rectory, barely 1 kilometer from the impact point at ground zero, supposedly being protected by the Virgin Mary from any destruction. Recall that anything within 2,500 feet of the blast of a single MOAB is lethal, from the power of the blast shockwave. There are about 3,300 feet in a kilometer (notice the 33), but you’re also dealing with way more blast power. If you believe that such a thing is possible given 1300+ MOABs worth of explosives — I have some beach front property in Phoenix to sell you. Besides that, Mary is dead and waiting to be resurrected, so whatever protection they did receive was actually from the father of lies.
Nevertheless, one of these Jesuits was Pedro Arrupe (who was arrested in Japan during his time there on charges of suspected espionage, I wonder why?), went on to become the 28th Jesuit General in 1965 — most likely as a reward for a successful performance at Hiroshima. Some allege that what actually took place was a combination of firebombing and some sort of EMP device, controlled by the Jesuits, but it doesn’t matter. Their presence there, their miraculous survival, and the subsequent publicity they helped to create for “surviving the world’s first atomic bomb”, along with all the previous facts, paint a very shady picture to say the least.
Because of all these things I do not believe nuclear weapons exist. That isn’t to say that very powerful explosives and dangerous weapons don’t exist, because they do. But the apocalyptic mega-explosion and nuclear armageddon that is marketed is just propaganda designed to bait people into the solution of world government and world peace, as well as leverage against those who have yet to participate in the central banking scheme and be integrated.
A TRACK RECORD OF FRAUD
Dr. Norman Finklestein, Jewish anti-Zionist journalist, says in his book, The Holocaust Industry, that:
“Much of the literature on Hitler’s Final Solution is worthless as scholarship, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense if not sheer fraud. Given the nonsense that is turned out daily by the Holocaust industry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics.”
When we survey the history of the last 80 years, we see plenty of examples in this regard, only adding to the need for healthy skepticism about the narrative that’s been propagated. In no particular order consider the following examples that are well documented:
Kurt Gerstein (German mining engineer, a member of the Nazi Party from 1933, of the SA in 1934, and later head of the SS Hygiene Institute from 1941 in Berlin): After supposedly witnessing mass murders in the Belzec and Treblinka, Gerstein gave a detailed report to Swedish diplomat Göran von Otter, as well as to Swiss diplomats, members of the Roman Catholic Church with contacts to Pope Pius XII, and to the Dutch government-in-exile, in an effort to inform the international community about the Holocaust as it was happening. In 1945, following his surrender, he wrote the Gerstein Report covering his experience of the Holocaust. During his imprisonment in France later that year, he was found hanged in his cell under circumstances that were never fully clarified. I personally think it is likely Gerstein was a defector and willing to perpetuate a narrative in exchange for his life, but regardless — several parts of his testimony were later discarded as completely fictitious, such as the claim that 25 million were killed by the Nazis or that there were piles of shoes 120 feet high at the camps from all the people who were murdered.
Rudolf Kauer (former inmate of Auschwitz): Admitted to lying about the accusations he made about the camp because he was drunk in pre-trial testimony. This is documented in the Miami Herald, dated July 7th 1964.
Binjamin Wilkomirski (Bruno Dössekker): His 1995 memoir Fragments: Memories of a Wartime Childhood detailed harrowing experiences as a child survivor of Auschwitz and Majdanek. It received prestigious awards and international acclaim. In 1998, Swiss journalist Daniel Ganzfried revealed that Wilkomirski was actually a Swiss-born Christian named Bruno Dössekker who spent the war safely in Switzerland.
Misha Defonseca (Monique de Wael): Author of the 1997 bestseller Misha: A Mémoire of the Holocaust Years, she claimed that as a young Jewish girl, she walked 1,900 miles across Europe, killed a Nazi soldier, and was protected by a pack of wolves. In 2008, forensic genealogists and historians proved she was actually a Belgian Catholic who spent the war years enrolled in a Brussels school. A court subsequently ordered her to return $22.5 million to her publisher.
Enric Marco: Marco was a prominent public figure in Spain, serving as the president of a major Spanish survivors’ association and giving hundreds of speeches about his survival at the Flossenbürg concentration camp. In 2005, historian Benito Bermejo unmasked him, proving Marco had never been in a concentration camp and had fabricated his entire history of anti-Nazi resistance. His story was later chronicled in Javier Cercas’s book The Impostor.
Herman and Roma Rosenblat: Exposed in 2008 as completely fabricating their romance narrative of meeting on opposite sides of the concentration camp fence. Herman was a genuine survivor of the Buchenwald subcamps. However, he fabricated the central romance of his intended 2008 memoir Angel at the Fence — the story that his future wife, Roma, saved him from starvation by throwing apples over a concentration camp fence, only for them to reconnect on a blind date decades later. Scholars and family members debunked the layout and logistics of the fence, leading to the book’s cancellation. When pressed for comment, Herman told Good Morning America that he had no regrets and would tell the story again, because even though it was his imagination — it was real to him.
Marie-Sophie Hingst: A German historian who successfully submitted 22 fabricated profiles of fictional Jewish relatives to the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial archive. She wrote extensively on a blog about being descended from Holocaust survivors. In 2019, Der Spiegel published a detailed exposé revealing that her family was actually entirely Christian and Protestant, with several ancestors active during the Nazi regime.
Rosemarie Koczy: An artist whose memoirs and public identity claimed she was a Jewish survivor deported to the Traunstein concentration camp as a child. Following her death, investigations by regional historians in 2017 revealed that her family was Catholic and she was born after the regional deportations took place.
Deborah Rey: A Dutch-born writer who penned a manuscript titled Rachel Sirai’s Vineyard, detailing a bitter story about her alleged birth mother, a Jewish violinist sent to Auschwitz. Forensic genealogists unmasked the work before publication by locating her brother, who confirmed they shared the same non-Jewish mother
Denis Avey: A British World War II veteran who wrote The Man Who Broke into Auschwitz (2011), claiming he sneaked into the Buna-Monowitz concentration camp for one night to switch places with a Jewish prisoner and witness the horrors firsthand. Holocaust historians and fellow veterans heavily disputed the logistical plausibility of his claims, and Yad Vashem ultimately declined to recognize him due to lack of verifiable proof.
The Claims Conference Fraud Case (2010): The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany uncovered a massive, $57.3 million institutional scam. Over a 16-year period, a network of insider employees—led by director Semyon Domnitser—and external recruiters processed more than 5,500 falsified, altered, or fabricated applications for German government-financed funds. In total, 31 individuals were convicted for their roles in constructing fake descriptions of persecution and doctoring identification files.
Barack Obama, as then president of the United States: claimed that he had an uncle who was among the first US troops to liberate Auschwitz, yet later this was exposed as a lie because it was the Russians who took over Auschwitz and Obama never had an uncle who served in the military.
These are just some notable examples of the countless more fraudulent Holocaust claims that exist over the last 80 years, and yet countless others that were never learned of or documented. If these are available with a simple Google search, and we are dealing with massive fraud and deception, does it not necessitate thorough investigation into the nature of the events of WWII? That there is rampant fraud and false testimony doesn’t in and of itself prove that the events in question never happened or are falsely recorded, but it does add to the weight of everything else in this brief investigation, reminding us that history is complicated and often nebulous.
6 MILLION PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING
For those familiar with occult secret societies and their penchant for predictive programming or “revealing the method”, it may interest the reader that the 6 million figure was blasted in media and newspapers decades before the events of WWII. In a Chicago publication called The Open Court, Volume XI dated May of 1897, the author describes the Jewish Bar Kokhba revolt of the 2nd century against the Romans having cost 6 million lives, even though this number is likely highly exaggerated and records of such things would be practically impossible to obtain.
Other similar mentions of the 6,000,00 figure are as follows:
“Startling reports of the conditions and future of Russia’s 6,000,000 Jews were made on March 12 in Berlin to the annual meeting of the Central Jewish Relief League of Germany by Dr. Paul Nathan, a well-known Berlin publicist, who has returned from an extensive trip through Russia as the special emissary of Jewish philanthropists in England, America and Germany, to arrange for distribution of the relief fund of $1,500,000 raised after the massacres last autumn.”
The New York Times, 1906
“Since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem the Jewish people have had no darker page in their history than that which the Russian Government is writing today. Six million Jews, one-half the Jewish people throughout the world, are being persecuted, hounded, humiliated, tortured, starved.”
The Sun, New York 1915
“(To Rebuild Jewry) Six million souls will need help to resume normal life when war is ended.”
The New York Times, 1918
“Mass meeting hears that 127,000 Jews have been killed and 6,000,000 are in peril.”
The New York Times, 1919
“Begs America Save 6,000,000 in Russia. Massacre threatens all Jews as Soviet power wanes, declares Kreinin, coming here for aid.”
The New York Times, 1920
“Six million Jews face starvation.”
The Gazette, Montreal 1931
(Referring to the) “…sufferings of the millions of Jews in the European Holocaust.”
The New York Times, 1936
“A depressing picture of 6,000,000 Jews in Central Europe deprived of protection or economic opportunities, slowly dying of starvation, all hope gone, was presented to the teachers by Jacob Tarshis...”
The New York Times, 1938
Other articles from papers or gazettes have been documented from as early as 1869 and onward through the end of the war in 1945, a lot of which either framed the world Jewish population as 6 million or appealed to the suffering and persecution of 6 million Jews in Europe and/or Soviet Russia. In an article in The Palm Beach Post dated June 25th, 1940, Dr. Nahum Goldmann (founder of the World Jewish Congress) rode the momentum of decades of this messaging and “predicted” that if the Nazis wouldn’t be stopped then 6,000,000 Jews in Europe were doomed to destruction.
So what do these things leave us with? Again it does not automatically prove that the events in WWII are completely fabricated or even wrongly reported. In such a nuanced and convoluted case there is nothing that can automatically prove anything. But little by little, it adds to the weight of the skepticism that hopefully is there by now given these facts. The cry of 6 million Jews being destroyed or persecuted was not invented after the Holocaust, it was in fact promulgated up to 70 years before it in various ways — and if that’s the case, it is healthy skepticism to ask the simple question: was this message simply adapted from pointing at the Soviets to pointing at the Nazis, so as to forever seal and justify the Allied victory?
CONCENTRATION CAMPS
We now turn our attention to an elaborate topic that many have written large books on and debated for decades. It is not my interest to document every single detail about this topic because I leave it to the reader to weigh all things and decide for themselves, or do further reading if they feel so called. But considering everything reviewed thus far, is it possible that the narrative surrounding what happened with the concentration camps is not 100% accurate?
To even ask such a thing is illegal in some parts of the world, which makes one wonder as to why. It is not illegal to question American slavery numbers, or the American slaughter and abuse of Native Americans, or the Holodomor (millions starved to death by Bolshevik communism). None of these atrocities demanded reparations. The Japanese did not demand reparations for being the world’s first supposed Guinea pigs for atomic warfare, nor did they cry for reparations from American concentration camps. Over 120,000 Japanese (2/3rds of which were US born citizens) were forced into these camps and mistreated, about 2,000 of which died, yet no reparations were ever declared for such things.
Jewish (atheist) historian David Cole documents that originally, in 1945, it was claimed that Germany had 22 death camps with gas chambers used to exterminate Jews. However by the 1950’s, 16 of those camps (72%) were revised due to investigations, leaving only a total of 6 camps with actual gas chambers. Memo number 31/48 of the Allied Military Police Headquarters in Vienna, dated January 10th, 1948, confirms this is the case:
“The Allied Committee of Inquiry has to date proven that no poison gas was ever used to kill prisoners in the following concentration camps: Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald, Dachau, FLossenburg, Gross-Rosen, Mauthausen and satellite camps Natzweiler, Neuengamme, Niederhagen (Wewelsburg), Ravensbruck, Sachsenhausen, Stutthof, Thereisenstadt. In all cases where gassings were alleged, it could be proven that torture had been used to extract confessions and witnesses have lied. Any former inmate who, during their debriefing continues to allege that poison gas was used to murder people (in particular Jews) are to be reported to this office and if they insist on lying further, they are to be charged with perjury.”
Signed Major Miller, Commanding Officer and witnessed by Lieutenant Lachout, MP
The remaining 6 camps were “liberated” by the Soviets, which includes Auschwitz, and these camps were never open for the same research done on the others, and therefore still to this day are claimed to have homicidal gas chambers despite lack of inquiry. Cole’s documentary, Cole in Auschwitz can still be found online for anyone who wants to investigate these issues further.
Cole’s skepticism is joined by many others, and much has been written and discussed on these matters despite the censorship (especially in Europe and abroad). Again, it is not my goal to enumerate or debate every single item, but I leave the following information for the reader to weigh and decide as to the nature of these things:
The original plaque at Auschwitz read that over 4 million people had been killed, only for that number to be revised 50 years later in 1995 down to 1.5 million, with modern estimates going even lower to about 1.1 million.
There has never been a Holocaust survivor with a 7 digit tattoo. Only 6 digit tattoos are recorded, which means we must believe that out of all those millions of people, only those in the first 20% (up to 1 million, or 7 digits) are the ones who conveniently survived, while not a single member of the other 80% ever made it out to tell their story. What is more likely is that they did not need 7 digit tattoos.
The chimney at Auschwitz was not present in aerial photographs (which museums have blown up and published themselves, ironically), but rather the chimney was added later by Allies after the fact, and a testament to this is that its location is completely unrelated to any sort of gassing chamber or crematorium. Aerial photographs that are on display also do not show any gas or fumes or giant piles of bodies, even though these reconnaissance photos were supposedly taken during the war at the height of these killings.
This is also the case with various holes in the roofs of these camps, claimed by mainstream narratives to be where Nazis would drop crystals of Zyklon-B to exterminate the people inside. However there are several testimonies from people who worked at these camps that such things were added later, calling into question the truthfulness of the Allied narrative. These sites were quickly taken over and those in power had full liberty to shape whatever narrative they saw fit, and it is quite possible that areas of these camps were altered (walls torn down, holes added on the roofs) in order to construct the image of giant gas chambers.
For example, Dr. Franciszek Piper, the senior curator and director of archives at the Auschwitz State Museum admitted on camera to David Cole that “Krema 1” (the alleged homicidal gas chamber at the Auschwitz main camp) was, in fact, fabricated after the war by the Soviet Union, under the direct orders of Stalin. This includes the fake chimney that is not even connected to the crematorium.
Dr. Frederick Toben, having done a documentary on Auschwitz, points out how ineffective it would have been for a Nazi soldier to stand on top of these roofs and try to pour Zyklon-B crystals into them, with powerful wind gusts blowing and scattering the substance all over the soldier and into the rest of the camp (including their own stations). He argues that German engineers, who at the time were far ahead of the rest of the world, would never make such foolish design or engineering choices as misplaced chimneys or haphazard roofing holes.
The majority of deaths were actually due to supply chains breaking down, leading to starvation and lack of Zyklon-B (the main pesticide gas used to delouse people of infections lice), which exacerbated the typhus epidemic. There are correspondences from Majdanek (concentration camp) pleading with the manufacturer of Zyklon-B because people were dying (both German and everyone else), documented by historian Ditlieb Felderer in an interview in 1985.
Zyklon-B (hydrogen cyanide gas) has a distinct blueish stain (Prussian blue is created for example when the gas interacts with iron-containing compounds), visible on walls even today decades later. Germany had fumigation chambers for clothing, because typhus was not a Jew-only disease — it was affecting everyone equally and required careful handling. So these fumigation chambers, which were small, were still stained blue from the Zyklon-B even decades later. Yet in none of the purported homicidal gas chambers do we see blue stains from this gas, nor were there testimonies or pictures of corpses with blueish or violet skin — a necessity if being poisoned by this substance.
The doors to these supposed gas chambers are not air tight, and they unlock from the inside and outside, which would make no sense if they were for extermination. To pull off the kind of slaughter that our history books allege, you must have gasketed (sealed) doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in and out safely and isolation of any kind of lighting or electrical components or heat generation. Yet what we find is that these camps were simple brick and mortar buildings without heat (to heat the gas), using non-explosion proof lighting, lacking gaskets doors (or any doors in some cases), and with crematories that were opened close to or adjacent to the facilities. None of these things make any sense for an operation of such an alleged magnitude and efficiency.
Piles of human hair supposedly found are explainable by the simple fact that typhus was a serious and documented issue, and in order to get deloused of infectious lice people had to be shaved.
Piles of shoes and clothing do not prove people were killed because they were admitted into the camps and given new clothes (uniforms) and shoes.
Most victims of gassings (alleged 2 million+) were supposedly gassed with diesel exhaust, or in “gas vans”. But diesel exhaust actually contains a low amount of carbon monoxide and a high amount of oxygen, which would have been a ridiculously slow and ludicrous way to kill that many people. Interestingly, a Soviet Jew named Isaj Berg actually invented the gas van two years before they were supposedly used by the Nazis. Berg was an officer of the administrative economic department of Moscow NKVD. In 1937, Berg was appointed as the supervisor of Butovo firing range, one of NKVD’s largest killing grounds, and was responsible to prepare the site for mass executions for the upcoming Great Purge. He devised the first gas vans in an effort to streamline the execution process — instead of waiting around to be shot and requiring additional security, the prisoners could be driven straight from prisons to the graves and killed on the way.
Dr. Larson, pathologist with the Judge Advocate Generals Office, led teams of pathologists with the invading Allied forces to do autopsies on corpses, reporting that, “not one case of death by poison gas was found.” Dr. John E. Gordon, Harvard Professor, was also with the US Forces, and reported that, “most deaths in concentration camps were caused, not by starvation nor maltreatment but by typhus.”
The so-called confessions of Nazis about their war crimes were largely obtained via torture. The British took a lot of the Nazis to a place called “The London Cage” (one of several such places, this one run by Colonel Alexander Scotland) where they tortured them and had them sign false confessions. Rudolf Höss (leading member of the Nazi party and star “witness” at the Nuremberg trials) didn’t speak English and yet they had him sign a false statement in English, saying that 2.5 million were killed in the Auschwitz camp, along with another 500k, totaling 3 million — yet these facts were later revised by a least 1 million so obviously even the mainstream proponents didn’t think these statements were believable. Rupert Butler's 1983 anti-Nazi book Legions of Death details British sergeant Bernard Clarke (a British official of Jewish descent) admitting (or bragging possibly) to severely beating and mistreating Rudolf Höss during capture, including threats to his family, to force a confession. Höss corroborated mistreatment in his memoirs Death Dealer, though he denied ongoing torture at Nuremberg. This supports coercion claims for his initial statements.
Judge Edward Van Roden was a member of the Simpson Army Commission that investigated the methods used at the Dachau Concentration Camp. In the January 9, 1949, Washington Daily News and in the January 23, 1949 London Sunday Pictorial he shared some examples of the use of torture. He said the investigators would “put a black hood over the accused’s head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair.”
Iowa Supreme Court justice Charles F. Wenersturm had resigned his appointment in disgust at the proceedings of the Nuremberg trials, stating in an article dated February 25, 1948 in the New York Times that “justice had been denied" in the German war crimes trials, and "the prosecution has failed to maintain objectivity aloof from vindictiveness," and that "the victor in any war is not the best judge of the war crime guilt." This is because Russian KGB officials, who themselves war war criminals, had been placed as judges over these cases.
DNA testing and historical investigations have repeatedly shown that several alleged Nazi-era “human skin” lampshades were actually made from animal skins like cowhide or goatskin, meaning these were intentionally used to misrepresent reality and create a distorted picture of the Germans to justify the narrative.
Deborah Lipstadt, a consultant for the Holocaust Memorial museum, wrote an article confirming that the story of Nazis using Jews to make soap was a complete fabrication. In the article, she says: “The fact is that the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that matter anyone else, for the production of soap. The soap rumor was prevalent both during and after the war. It may have had its origin in the cadaver factory atrocity story that came out of World War I. The letters ‘RJF’ probably stood for the name of the factory that produced the soap. The soap rumor was thoroughly investigated after the war and proved to be untrue.”
War crimes of Allies, like the looting and pillaging of Bolsheviks or the fire bombing of civilians in Dresden, were never accounted for, nor did Germany receive reparations for these heinous and barbaric acts. The fact that Churchill and the Allies instigated Hitler, after numerous attempts by the latter to de-escalate, into conflict is never addressed by the history books. The fact that the US knew about Pearl Harbor and allowed it to happen so they could justify entering the war is never addressed. The death of millions due to communism and its various persecutions (like the Holodomor) is also hardly ever discussed in light of the media attention that the Holocaust receives when it comes to matters of WWII. Why? Because history is written by the winners.
The involvement of the Red Cross, an organization ultimately connected to the Vatican, is also very interesting. On one hand we are told the Nazis were systematically killing people (thousands per day) throughout the war, yet on the other we are also to believe that the Nazis allowed the Red Cross to inspect these same camps and interview prisoners during the same period. A USA Today article dated December 19th, 1996, the following is documented:
“Many Jewish readers and Holocaust experts long have contended that the Red Cross failed spectacularly during World War II - mostly by not raising an alarm about Nazi atrocities - and compounded the failure later by refusing the acknowledge it. In fact, in a Nov. 22, 1944, letter to US State Depart officials about the visit, the Red Cross said: ‘We had not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners.’ In this case, the documents show, the Red Cross failed at every possible turn. Not only had Red Cross officials neglected to grasp the situation, but they then passed along bad information to the Allies. Several Red Cross documents suggest that the organization was reluctant, at least initially, to put much faith in tales and rumors of Nazi brutality. Like the general public, Red Cross officials didn’t comprehend the true extent of the Nazis’ crimes...’There is no doubt that the Red Cross let itself be used by the Nazis,’ says Radu Ioanid, director of the Holocaust Survivors Registry at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum. ‘There is no doubt they were fooled.’”
Further complicating the matter is that the original death toll given by the Red Cross was about 270,000. Mainstream proponents have clever responses to these things, claiming that the majority of people who died were never recorded with death certificates which is why the number is so low, or that these figures only include 13 specific concentration camps rather than all of the other extermination camps also, or that the SS destroyed records as the Allies were advancing, or that hundreds of thousands were killed in open-air mass shootings outside of the infrastructure of camps (by the Einsatzgruppen, or paramilitary wing of the SS). However there were only 3000-4000 of these forces, which would have made it impossible to kill millions of people. Here the mainstream narrative claims that these paramilitary forces recruited tens of thousands of willing participants to patrol and find people (mostly Jews) to slaughter, however these reports are unfalsifiable and likely exaggerated, since the role of the Einsatzgruppen was more likely a supportive role working with military operations, not to waste time and resources on hunting Jews down who were in hiding as we are led to believe. Interestingly, the Red Cross’ position is that it has never compiled an ‘official’ death toll and that it defers to the mainstream academic authorities, remaining silent on the issue.
The mainstream explanation to these things is that the Nazis staged the camp to be very idyllic and deceived the Red Cross inspectors, but the Red Cross delivered hundreds of thousands of packages throughout the area during the war and also inspected more than one camp. Are we to believe that the Red Cross was in a conspiracy with the Nazis to hide a major atrocity, or were the institutional powers upset that the Red Cross wasn’t as zealous for the new narrative? I let the reader decide.
There is also the matter of math, and math does not lie. We will use the example of Treblinka and one can extrapolate the data as they see fit to the rest of this topic. It is claimed that about 900,000 people were killed at this camp. The area of the camp is approximately 400x600 meters, or a total surface area of 240,000 square meters. The allotted area for burial pits and mass graves was approximately 17,500 square meters.
But now taking an amount of 900,000 bodies and calculating the required size of the mass grave to hold this amount of volume, and assuming a pit 6 bodies deep with bodies stacked on top of each other, you would need an area over 7 times larger than what Treblinka’s dedicated mass grave site has available, or an area approximately 367x367 meters in coverage. That is an enormous amount of space, because killing and burying that many people is an enormous feat of engineering.
The mainstream narrative says that most of the killing was done by burning, so they didn’t need such large mass graves. Fair enough, but where is the evidence? Diesel fuel is not effective at burning bodies, and to burn that many on logs would require an insane amount of forestry and resources to leverage, because you need dry wood and dry wood would have needed to be cut and stored beforehand — all during a two front war where fuel and resources and manpower was extremely vital for defense and offense. On what basis would Germany commit so much of its resources to such an insane operation? It makes no sense.
To be clear, these camps did have crematories for basic handling of deaths from starvation or typhus, but by no means were these processing (or even capable of processing) hundreds of thousands of bodies. And today the supposed mass grave sites are blocked from investigation, yet when these things have been investigated in the past — there were many questions raised as a result of the findings.
For example, a detailed forensic examination of the site of the wartime Treblinka camp, using sophisticated electronic ground radar, found no evidence of mass graves there. For six days in October 1999, an Australian team headed by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer, carried out an examination of the soil at the site of the former Treblinka camp in Poland, where, Holocaust historians say that more than half a million Jews were put to death in gas chambers and then buried in mass graves. Krege’s team used an $80,000 Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) device, which sends out vertical radar signals that can pick up earth disturbances and objects as small as a knife down to 30 meters underground. The results can be seen immediately as they are projected as pictures onto a computer monitor.
The team spent 3 weeks scanning the whole camp area and the scans were saved onto a laptop computer. As well as scanning, the team took measurements to determine the age of the trees, and took earth core samples down to 6 meters looking for signs of human and wooden ash. They also scanned and took control samples outside of the camp area. After 3 weeks worth of work, the team found nothing: no graves, no ash, no remains of buildings or fences. So they returned to Australia. The scans that were stored were transferred to CD-roms and these were sent to experts worldwide for their opinions. The results obtained by the Australian researchers argue that a Nazi extermination camp never existed at the area called Treblinka.
CONCLUSION
The story of WWII is a convoluted one because of the political and financial motives propping it up, as well as the fact that the world’s elite are directly involved in numerous ways, from the Knights of Malta and Jesuits, to elite Jewry, Freemasons, central banksters and everyone “in the club.” Many have written and documented these things extensively, however it is important to realize several key points in order to come out of this with a narrow road understanding:
History is complex, and the revisionists are not immune from error or exaggeration themselves (like Meyer Levin being the secret ghost author of Anne Frank’s diary)
Historical revisionism is rife with pro-Catholic, pro-white nationalist, fascist extremists, and an open door to poor theology (like white Israelism or serpent seed theories)
Zionism is not the ruling force of the world and is destined to collapse, it is not what the Bible warns of in Revelation 13 or 17 or the book of Daniel
Most people today have incorrect eschatology, and as a result will be deceived by the coming Catholic Social Teaching golden age
The exposing of Zionism and elite Jewry since 2023 has been coordinated to shuffle people back into traditional religion and ultimately set a precedent to persecute those who will reject the counterfeit golden age
All of these points are necessary to remember when studying the events of World War II. Today with the Internet we can access information very quickly, but of course some things are still difficult to get properly edified on, such as the Holocaust or nuclear weapons. It may be possible that, along with the destruction of Zionism, the truth about the Holocaust will come out and it will only add to the calculated destruction of the Jewish identity. Or maybe not, but in either case there is enough here and in other resources to retain a healthy amount of skepticism, which is what my position is.
I do not glorify Nazi Germany or Hitler or the Allies or the Soviets. They were all wicked, because the Bible says mankind is wicked. But what we have been told by our history books on this particular topic has been wildly blown out of proportion for a very specific agenda, and also to cover the genuine war crimes of those who “saved the world” from the Nazis.
Yet today we see a return to these attitudes. The America First movement that is growing rapidly in popularity as a non-Zionist alternative to MAGA is actually named after a movement over 80 years ago (in the 1930’s) by the same exact name, a movement of pro-Nazi Americans who were gaining traction and even running Nazi parades in Madison Square Garden (see Camp Siegfried, Long Island). As people learn about the lies of WWII, and the influence of Zionism, the Mossad, AIPAC, etc. in not only US affairs but worldwide — it has now become trendy and “based” to question the Holocaust and to “notice” any Jewish influence in politics, finance, media or culture.
But unbeknownst to these young and impressionable minds, they are not actually thinking for themselves. They are being baited into a pre-calculated outcome long in the making. Dark to light. That is, the false light of Catholicism, traditionalism, nationalism and institutional control. People cheered Hitler on because of his charisma and because he solved some pain points for his people, but Hitler was a crazy fanatic and this is the point.
In the end there is nothing new under the sun, and while it is important to know enough about history and events like WWII so that you are not deceived, there is such a thing as knowing “too much” in a sense and being deceived in the opposite direction. What matters is the real truth, and that truth is Christ. Whether a Nazi or a Soviet or a Jew, they all need the gospel because Jesus will return to judge the living and the dead. And with the end of all things at hand, what matters more than knowing how many people actually died in the Holocaust is understanding how many countless more will die in their sins for marveling at the wrong things — if they do not learn the truth of where all of this is going.
