With the advent of a new Pope, students of prophecy and history are keen to take note of the many intentional parallels of his chosen name, Leo XIV, as well as the familiar messages of unity and brotherly love that have immediately been promulgated into the world.
Tudor you are an unconscious comedian! , still giggling after the comment ' Stubborn little jew' Thank you Tudor for another epic production on truth .
Right? Yes, he uses humor intentionally, and it's great. But, like you say, the in between reactions are solid gold. :) I had to pause him once and when I came back I had a very funny look right before he was covering a SNL episode. :)
Been listening to OSAS series and I absolutely love it. I am glad you did put it back up there for everyone to hear. Will listen to this new VDS soon. Thank you Tudor 💕
"The New Testament was written by Jews...".??? The New Testamont was written by the Apostles - as we all know, so they were not "Jews". My understanding is Jews are descended from the Edomite Pharisee who demanded He be crucified - not "Judeans"(spellchecked?). Religious Jews are imposters pretending to be descended from Yeshua's people, most now living in the Zionist state - the imposter Israel of God.
I'm learning much from your videos, but there are so many excellent biblical researchers I can't follow them all, and wish I had more time to spend here learning from you. I wonder how you have enough time to research and create these videos too - it seems inhuman. I feel bad about our interaction yesterday under the "Lord's Day" video, I was wrong to be so accusing and insulting. I'm old and have some dementia, and get cranky sometimes as a result - I'll try not to be that way anymore, Lord forgive me. I am not a deliberate liar and never deliberately delete things, so your false accusation triggered me. Two thinking people will never agree about everything, but that doesn't mean we can't still learn from each other. In that spirit - I'm interested in why you believe "Jews" wrote the New Testamont, which seems diametrically opposed to the truth as I understand it...?
EDIT: I hate doing edits, but I made an error above, supposedly most (all except Judas?) of the Apostles were from the tribe of Benjamin -not Judeans, it's controversial. Judeans were very corrupted at the time Yeshua appeared among them, so it makes sense His followers would be from another tribe?
I sent you a screenshot of your original comment in your Substack messages. Go look at it. It is impossible for that to happen unless you posted that comment. Then you edited your comment. Do not act like you didn't do it. Take ownership. If you forgot because of your dementia, then let it be a lesson to you that you can do things you don't want to do or say things you don't want to say and then 100% forget about them, which is worrisome. But the fact is you wrote what you wrote, with a particular tone, and I responded to that comment. Then you changed it and gaslit me that I am hallucinating or that you never did. Well, the Internet keeps record of everything friend. So please don't play games.
The word "Jew" is first used in the book of Esther to refer to those who were left after the pagan conquests, namely the ones from Judah, some Benjamin and a few others who were not exiled. So Jew is Israelite, but not all Israelites were Jews. It is true that later the Edomites were converted by force and this complicates things, but Paul says he is a Jew so the term has a meaning that needs context like all things. Today the word "Jew" hardly means anyone from Judah.
I'm old and don't remember what happened, didn't even return to that thread and don't plan to. Whatever happened it was NOT intentional, and I was NOT trying to gaslight you, as I said I'm old and have dementia. I learned from you that biblical cosmology is based on the sun, not the moon, which I already knew but maybe forgot (dementia is horrible to have)? ANYways, you have my apology if that's what happened. As for the word "Jew", it wasn't even invented until the late 1700s, so I can't agree with you on that subject. History was changed to make it appear like it's an old term, but it isn't. Judaism was a term coined during the same period, previously the Khazian Edomites had been called "Talmudists". That's my understanding, and you not agreeing doesn't change my opinion, and this IS a VERY important topic. This is why I don't trust you, you're appearing as an angel of light, which is what we were warned to be on guard against. Just saying...
EDIT>: This edit is because I made another obvious mistake (I need to be more carful - I hate doing edits): instead of "the khazarian Edomites had been called Talmudists" I should have used the term "Yiddish people", which is what they were called until the 1700s. Benjamin Fulford stated that, and it's never been refuted to my knowledge - if he had been wrong, why can't I find any refutation of his claims? They were the Yiddish people with Talmudist rabbis, rather than Jewish people with rabbis who practiced Judaism. The terms Jewish and Judaism were created for the Zionist deception, so people would conflate them with the Judean people who Yeshua came from. Now the Jews in the Zionist state claim to be the "chosen people", the same people as Jesus Christ came from. That's my understanding, maybe you can direct me to some of your work that will teach my I have it wrong...?
You are a contentious man and you do not take responsibility for your actions very well. You are an adult and you can check your chat in Substack, where you messaged me, so it's not like you don't know where it is, and you can see proof that you wrote what you wrote. If you are accusing me in one minute and then suddenly you forget and the next minute you are showering me with compliments then that's not someone I can take seriously.
So now you are accusing me yet again, saying I "appear as an angel of light." Do I appear to anyone as an angel? Am I manifesting in the sky with shiny lights around me? You do not understand what that verse means to apply it to this situation, and even when someone has the patience to engage you it is impossible to stay patient forever because of your attitude.
The word Jew first appears in the book of Esther. Esther takes place 2400 years ago. That is 1700 years BEFORE the KJV. Just because the word "Jew" in English wasn't used until 1700 doesn't mean it didn't exist. It is based on the term "Yehudi" which were those from the tribe of Judah (Yudah), but also encompasses Benjamin and other tribes that weren't exiled totally during the Assyrian deportation. So it is a term, at that time, that refers to the remnant of Israel.
That term was increasingly diluted over time, but that doesn't mean anything. Context determines the meaning of a word, and Paul refers to himself as a Jew in Acts 21:39, and Paul wrote a lot of the New Testament.
"Just because the word "Jew" in English wasn't used until 1700 doesn't mean it didn't exist."
If a word didn't exist, then it didn't exist - I don't follow your logic. You are conflating the English terms "Jew or Jewish" with other words from other languages.
As for the other topic, I'll go back and go over it again some other time, right now I have other things to do. You are paranoid, I never intentionally tried to gaslight you. Your lack of humility and misunderstanding of basic biblical truths is what makes me feel you are an angel of light deceiver. "Angel" is a loaded term my friend, and has many meanings. You are well-meaning I believe, but the best controlled opposition are people who believe they are teaching the truth. You haven't changed my opinion about Jews, and I know the term is supposedly derived from, but it's a deception. That's my assumption, and you haven't changed it - I've done too much research for a know-it-all arrogant prig to change my mind now.
You are an arrogant know-it-all and contentious person. I am canceling your subscription because you have no business being here if you are going to accuse me of being a deceiver, controlled opposition, "angel of light" and literally refuse clear evidence that you are a liar.
Whether you forgot what you did is something God alone knows, but I have proof of what you wrote and I have proof you changed your comment and accused me of being the paranoid one for "over reacting" to you, when in fact I was responding to your snotty, self-assure comment and again there's physical proof of that. You don't want to see the proof because you are an arrogant man that cannot stand correction.
I have also explained to you the situation with the Jews, and you take your own feelings over pure facts. Paul uses the term to apply to himself, and in Greek that term is IOUDAOI - the same term used for the evil Pharisees who crucified Christ. That presents you with a problem, because in all the "research" you've done it means you don't understand basic biblical principles and how to use context.
I just got to the coverage of the White House Wire on this video (which is great). It's not like I didn't know what's up, but I guess that crystallized it, the horror. Albeit I was a little dazed at the Kenneth Copeland appointment that already had me in Bizarro World, yikes. :)
I attend a reformed church and one of the pastors named his son Augustine after Augustine but how could that be possible? Why would a reformed pastor name their son after a Catholic priest and why does the reformed church esteem him ?
Because he had a lot of things to say about predestination, but they don't realize the other things he said about church and state, the priestly office, transubstantiation, etc.
Tudor you are an unconscious comedian! , still giggling after the comment ' Stubborn little jew' Thank you Tudor for another epic production on truth .
I'm glad you enjoyed it ☺️
Right? Yes, he uses humor intentionally, and it's great. But, like you say, the in between reactions are solid gold. :) I had to pause him once and when I came back I had a very funny look right before he was covering a SNL episode. :)
Been listening to OSAS series and I absolutely love it. I am glad you did put it back up there for everyone to hear. Will listen to this new VDS soon. Thank you Tudor 💕
Love your intro music...FIRE!!!
NEW WORLD ORDER OF FALSE CHRISTIANITY... MYSTERY BABYLON!!! RIGHT ON BROTHER!
"The New Testament was written by Jews...".??? The New Testamont was written by the Apostles - as we all know, so they were not "Jews". My understanding is Jews are descended from the Edomite Pharisee who demanded He be crucified - not "Judeans"(spellchecked?). Religious Jews are imposters pretending to be descended from Yeshua's people, most now living in the Zionist state - the imposter Israel of God.
I'm learning much from your videos, but there are so many excellent biblical researchers I can't follow them all, and wish I had more time to spend here learning from you. I wonder how you have enough time to research and create these videos too - it seems inhuman. I feel bad about our interaction yesterday under the "Lord's Day" video, I was wrong to be so accusing and insulting. I'm old and have some dementia, and get cranky sometimes as a result - I'll try not to be that way anymore, Lord forgive me. I am not a deliberate liar and never deliberately delete things, so your false accusation triggered me. Two thinking people will never agree about everything, but that doesn't mean we can't still learn from each other. In that spirit - I'm interested in why you believe "Jews" wrote the New Testamont, which seems diametrically opposed to the truth as I understand it...?
EDIT: I hate doing edits, but I made an error above, supposedly most (all except Judas?) of the Apostles were from the tribe of Benjamin -not Judeans, it's controversial. Judeans were very corrupted at the time Yeshua appeared among them, so it makes sense His followers would be from another tribe?
David,
I sent you a screenshot of your original comment in your Substack messages. Go look at it. It is impossible for that to happen unless you posted that comment. Then you edited your comment. Do not act like you didn't do it. Take ownership. If you forgot because of your dementia, then let it be a lesson to you that you can do things you don't want to do or say things you don't want to say and then 100% forget about them, which is worrisome. But the fact is you wrote what you wrote, with a particular tone, and I responded to that comment. Then you changed it and gaslit me that I am hallucinating or that you never did. Well, the Internet keeps record of everything friend. So please don't play games.
The word "Jew" is first used in the book of Esther to refer to those who were left after the pagan conquests, namely the ones from Judah, some Benjamin and a few others who were not exiled. So Jew is Israelite, but not all Israelites were Jews. It is true that later the Edomites were converted by force and this complicates things, but Paul says he is a Jew so the term has a meaning that needs context like all things. Today the word "Jew" hardly means anyone from Judah.
I'm old and don't remember what happened, didn't even return to that thread and don't plan to. Whatever happened it was NOT intentional, and I was NOT trying to gaslight you, as I said I'm old and have dementia. I learned from you that biblical cosmology is based on the sun, not the moon, which I already knew but maybe forgot (dementia is horrible to have)? ANYways, you have my apology if that's what happened. As for the word "Jew", it wasn't even invented until the late 1700s, so I can't agree with you on that subject. History was changed to make it appear like it's an old term, but it isn't. Judaism was a term coined during the same period, previously the Khazian Edomites had been called "Talmudists". That's my understanding, and you not agreeing doesn't change my opinion, and this IS a VERY important topic. This is why I don't trust you, you're appearing as an angel of light, which is what we were warned to be on guard against. Just saying...
EDIT>: This edit is because I made another obvious mistake (I need to be more carful - I hate doing edits): instead of "the khazarian Edomites had been called Talmudists" I should have used the term "Yiddish people", which is what they were called until the 1700s. Benjamin Fulford stated that, and it's never been refuted to my knowledge - if he had been wrong, why can't I find any refutation of his claims? They were the Yiddish people with Talmudist rabbis, rather than Jewish people with rabbis who practiced Judaism. The terms Jewish and Judaism were created for the Zionist deception, so people would conflate them with the Judean people who Yeshua came from. Now the Jews in the Zionist state claim to be the "chosen people", the same people as Jesus Christ came from. That's my understanding, maybe you can direct me to some of your work that will teach my I have it wrong...?
You are a contentious man and you do not take responsibility for your actions very well. You are an adult and you can check your chat in Substack, where you messaged me, so it's not like you don't know where it is, and you can see proof that you wrote what you wrote. If you are accusing me in one minute and then suddenly you forget and the next minute you are showering me with compliments then that's not someone I can take seriously.
So now you are accusing me yet again, saying I "appear as an angel of light." Do I appear to anyone as an angel? Am I manifesting in the sky with shiny lights around me? You do not understand what that verse means to apply it to this situation, and even when someone has the patience to engage you it is impossible to stay patient forever because of your attitude.
The word Jew first appears in the book of Esther. Esther takes place 2400 years ago. That is 1700 years BEFORE the KJV. Just because the word "Jew" in English wasn't used until 1700 doesn't mean it didn't exist. It is based on the term "Yehudi" which were those from the tribe of Judah (Yudah), but also encompasses Benjamin and other tribes that weren't exiled totally during the Assyrian deportation. So it is a term, at that time, that refers to the remnant of Israel.
That term was increasingly diluted over time, but that doesn't mean anything. Context determines the meaning of a word, and Paul refers to himself as a Jew in Acts 21:39, and Paul wrote a lot of the New Testament.
"Just because the word "Jew" in English wasn't used until 1700 doesn't mean it didn't exist."
If a word didn't exist, then it didn't exist - I don't follow your logic. You are conflating the English terms "Jew or Jewish" with other words from other languages.
As for the other topic, I'll go back and go over it again some other time, right now I have other things to do. You are paranoid, I never intentionally tried to gaslight you. Your lack of humility and misunderstanding of basic biblical truths is what makes me feel you are an angel of light deceiver. "Angel" is a loaded term my friend, and has many meanings. You are well-meaning I believe, but the best controlled opposition are people who believe they are teaching the truth. You haven't changed my opinion about Jews, and I know the term is supposedly derived from, but it's a deception. That's my assumption, and you haven't changed it - I've done too much research for a know-it-all arrogant prig to change my mind now.
You are an arrogant know-it-all and contentious person. I am canceling your subscription because you have no business being here if you are going to accuse me of being a deceiver, controlled opposition, "angel of light" and literally refuse clear evidence that you are a liar.
Whether you forgot what you did is something God alone knows, but I have proof of what you wrote and I have proof you changed your comment and accused me of being the paranoid one for "over reacting" to you, when in fact I was responding to your snotty, self-assure comment and again there's physical proof of that. You don't want to see the proof because you are an arrogant man that cannot stand correction.
I have also explained to you the situation with the Jews, and you take your own feelings over pure facts. Paul uses the term to apply to himself, and in Greek that term is IOUDAOI - the same term used for the evil Pharisees who crucified Christ. That presents you with a problem, because in all the "research" you've done it means you don't understand basic biblical principles and how to use context.
I just got to the coverage of the White House Wire on this video (which is great). It's not like I didn't know what's up, but I guess that crystallized it, the horror. Albeit I was a little dazed at the Kenneth Copeland appointment that already had me in Bizarro World, yikes. :)
I often wondered about the nicene creed because it says it believes in one holy Catholic Church.
Which I was told that that reference to the Catholic Church meant the church at the beginning and not the Catholic Church we see now
I attend a reformed church and one of the pastors named his son Augustine after Augustine but how could that be possible? Why would a reformed pastor name their son after a Catholic priest and why does the reformed church esteem him ?
Because he had a lot of things to say about predestination, but they don't realize the other things he said about church and state, the priestly office, transubstantiation, etc.
Wow !
Would this be something you would leave a church ? Besides them holding to a Sunday sabbath and now this?
I always look forward to these!!